Friday, February 28, 2014

Price Comparisons for Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED Film Scanner

Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED Film Scanner

Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED Film Scanner Review


An external film scanner with a 4,000 dpi optical resolution / Scans 120/220 up to 6x9, 35mm, 16mm, & microscope slide / Firewire


Price :
* Get the best price and special discount only for limited time



Nikon Super Coolscan 8000 ED Film Scanner Feature


  • Scans 35mm, 120/220, 16mm, electron microscope and prepared microscope slides
  • True 4,000 dpi optical resolution, 48-bit color
  • Large diameter Nikkor ED high-resolution lens
  • LED technology avoids costly recalibrations and light-source replacements
  • IEEE-1394 Firewire interface; PC and Mac compatible






Maybe you should visit the following website to get a better price and specification details

Costumer review

42 of 44 people found the following review helpful.
5Nikon's Medium Format Film Scanner--the 8000ED
By D. A. Lindsay
If you have both 35mm and medium format transparencies and or negatives to bring into the digital age, I heartily recommend the Nikon Super Coolscan 8000ED. Firewire equipped, it is designed to work easily with the current line of graphics capable computers. Its bundled software has worked well for me (using a MAC with OSX and Firewire) and features three special capabilities. (1) Digital ICE3 will gently remove scratches and dust saving you hours of retouching (it doesn't work well with Kodachrome and black and white silver based emulsions). (2) ROC will restore colors to faded slides. It really works! (3) GEM gives you the ability to affect grain appearance. For the highest resolution imaging (4000DPI) the process takes some time. You also need to make sure that you have a fairly up to date computer. Some serious computing is going on here and with file sizes in the hundreds of Megabytes, you can't run this with your TRS-80. I run the Nikon Scan 3 software separately from PhotoShop 7 so that I can run one while working with the other. Otherwise while it's scanning, it will lock up your PS from use. It comes with a myriad of trays which work generally quite well but it cannot handle stack loaders. This is strictly a one strip at a time scanner. After all, these are some serious file sizes. While expensive, the 8000ED is approaching the quality of a drum scanner without the mess and the expense. For most work this is truly going to deliver.

5 of 5 people found the following review helpful.
4Best scanner for the $$--still.
By SFC
When Nikon discontinued the 9000 scanner, the price shot into the stratosphere. So what's serious film photographer supposed to do now? At less than half the price of the 9000, the 8000 does almost the same job, though a little slower. Let's face it--there is simply nothing besides the 8000 between the Epsons at around $700 and the 9000 at $4000 used or $6000 new (if you can even find one...).

Yes, the 8000 is a little long in the tooth, and most units are at least 10 years old. It's a little slow, a little noisy, and has a few quirks that need to be worked around. But if you shoot MF film and want the highest possible resolution and can't afford $40 for a single drum scan, the 8000 will do it. Sharpness compared to an Epson flatbed (I own the V500) is noticeably better, and the 8000 is resolving grain that the Epson cannot. What else is better compared to an Epson? For one thing, the Nikon, supposedly due to its light source, picks up far less dust and scratches on the film. And Digital ICE is more effective. Color in general is better--sometimes it seems the Epson only guesses at what colors my negative are. If you need to print big, the Epsons simply aren't suitable. And there's no point in using fine lenses (I have a Mamiya 6 system) unless you can get a good scan. I had no idea my lenses were so sharp until I started using the 8000. Surface detail on objects suddenly appears, and other fine details invisible to the Epson.

The 8000 does have its quirks, however, and they are well-known and discussed on the internet. The first is that while the holders are generally excellent and heavy-duty (they put the Epson film holders to shame), the standard MF may not get the best sharpness from 120 film due to the difficulty of holding the film flat. Many users opt for the glass holder, which holds the film flat between two sheets of glass, but at over $250 (used), it's not a cheap option. There's a cheaper one: the glass from my betterscanning.com film holder fits perfectly, and can be had for only $29.99. My scans are now consistently grain-sharp. The second quirk of the Nikon is its tendency to create banding patterns. This only happens in fast mode, and can be eliminated by always opting for "fine" mode. I've only seen it so far in 120, but not in the last set of 35mm scans I did. It's not a big deal, but does slow down the scans considerably.

Software may be an issue for some users, depending on the computer/operating system used. Some report success with Nikon Scan software (free from Nikons' website), and some don't. I worked great for a while on my Mac running 10.5.8, but then it refused. Fortunately, Vuescan has come to the rescue with it's ridiculously cheap ($39.99) scanning software. It does just about everything the Nikon software does, including batch scanning (many have claimed it won't batch scan on the 8000, but that's nonsense--you just have to configure it correctly. One advantage of Vuescan is that it'll run any other scanner you have. The same can't be said of Silverfast, which is scanner-specific. Although Silverfast is probably better, it's also over $400.

In summary, the NIkon 8000 ED does have its shortcomings, but there is currently nothing that gets close to its native resolution for what it costs (I never have to sharpen scans). If you're committed to film and can't afford the 9000, then get an 8000--it's the next best thing. The price will no doubt drift upwards with that of the 9000 (all the other recent Nikon scanners are now multiples of their original price), so if you can find one, buy it.

1 of 1 people found the following review helpful.
5Medium Format Film Scanning Bang For Your Buck Best
By E. Klatt
.
This review was written for Ebay in 2008.

With it's successor going for twice as much on the used market (when it can be found) and Nikon's shipping schedule as inconsistent as it can be just when your looking for the newer LS-9000, the 8000ED becomes a real alternative, especially when, with a little research, you begin to realize that even though the 9000 solved the few problems the 8000 has, those problems are minor and always ready for a simple work around that can result in scans to be proud of, even if the process might become somewhat lengthened. In the end it's about image quality; color, contrast and resolution along with a basis for beautiful output. At today's used price, the Coolscan LS-8000ED is more than hard to beat. The gratification your film should engender as it moves to be seen in the digital world will come well within reach with the 8000ED.

Compare Prices Epson B11B178011 Perfection V700 Photo Scanner

Epson B11B178011 Perfection V700 Photo Scanner

Epson B11B178011 Perfection V700 Photo Scanner Review


Get professional quality results from virtually any photographic original with the Epson Perfection V700 photo scanner. With groundbreaking 6400 DPI resolution, the powerful scanner consistantly delivers precision color and detail, whether scanning slides, negatives, or medium-format film. With a 4.0 DMax, it offers exceptional image quality, excellent detail in shadow areas and remarkable tonal range.


Price : $629.00
* Get the best price and special discount only for limited time



Epson B11B178011 Perfection V700 Photo Scanner Feature


  • Photo scanner reproduces photographs with professional quality
  • 6,400 dpi resolution: incredible precision and detail
  • Can scan slides, negatives, and medium format film
  • Innovative dual lens system automatically selects two lenses for desired resolution
  • 4.0 Dmax for exceptional image quality






Maybe you should visit the following website to get a better price and specification details

Costumer review

852 of 860 people found the following review helpful.
3It's doing the job, but...
By J. Peterson
I bought this scanner a month ago to scan the several thousand slides I have taken over the past years. I'm not a professional photographer - my expectations were only to digitize my slides to the same quality as the photos I have been taking with my 7mp digital camera. After receiving the scanner (which set up easily) I did an extensive set of tests to determine the appropriate settings (resolution, compression, etc), and then set about scanning my slides.

Now that I am 2/3 done with the task I can say that it's working OK, but there are goods and bads. I have no experience with other film scanners so I can't say how this unit compares to others, but here's what I have learned:

* Many have complained about the flimsiness of the plastic slide holder. Mine has held up fine so far, but I can find no information anywhere about how I would get a replacement if I broke the one that came with the scanner, which concerns me a little.

* Epson's web site is not very helpful. They have a simple FAQ with some basic items, but nothing really helpful, and no discussion groups. You are on your own.

* As others have commented, the included software is pretty basic, but I think it gets the job done. It has at least 2 very annoying flaws, though. One is that every time I preview scan another set of 12 slides, it turns off the dust removal and/or digital ICE selection. This means that you need to remember to turn it back on with every scan, which I have forgotten to do some times. There appears to be a way of saving your settings, but even that gets reset on every scan, so is useless. Maybe there is a way to make this work right, but the sparse documentation yields no clues.

* Another software issue is its ability to recognize the vertical or horizontal orientation of slides. Mostly it does a really good job with this, but sometimes it guesses wrong, e.g. it will think a slide is vertical when it actually is horizontal. Usually this happens if the slide has a dark background. Unfortunately when it guesses wrong, it crops off the sides or the top/bottom of the picture, so you can't just rotate it 90 degrees. Most of the time when I notice a wrong guess I have been able to correct it by rotating the slide 90 degrees and re-previewing, but I have several slides where it simply insists on getting it wrong and the software provides no way to override this behavior. A related bad behavior occurs if you have a slide that has a bright rectangle on a dark background, e.g. a shot of TV screen - in that case, it tries to zoom in on part of the picture, cropping off much of it including even some of the light area. I can find no way to defeat this behavior, so apparently the only remedy is to crop this type of image manually, which is going to be very labor intensive.

* Another problem relates to a hardware design flaw that I am very surprised that no one has mentioned. After scanning my first several batches of slides and examining the results carefully, I went into a mode of scanning without taking the time to examine every resulting image. After scanning a LOT of slides, I started reviewing the results and was horrified to notice that on certain batches, there were 2 faint vertical lines (one green, one blue) down certain scans. I finally noticed that the lines seemed to be on 4 consecutive slides out of every 12 (the slide holder contains 12 slides), so that was a clue. Notice that the top of the scanner has a transparent slit down the middle - apparently this is a sexy feature so you can see where the scanner light is and watch its motion. Well, it also admits other light into the scanner, at least under certain ambient light conditions, ruining the scans of the 4 slides in the middle column. I fixed this by taping a piece of cardboard to the top of the scanner. And now I have to re-scan a lot of messed-up images.

* I really can't notice that the Digital ICE feature does anything except quadruple the amount of time it takes to scan each set of slides. I tried doing scans with it and without it, and can notice little difference. Not much of a problem, since I the Epson software de-selects the option to use it after each preview scan as mentioned above.

* I suppose it's not really a fault of the scanner, but watch out for dust! It's really important to blow off your slides before every scan, and also the scanner glass. Despite being really careful, I still have a big issue with dust. Would have been nice if Epson had included a brush and something to blow with (I got a squeeze bulb blower that helps a lot). When I am done with my scanning project I'm considering replacing the electronic air cleaner in my home with this unit, since it seems to be a dust magnet! :-)

* One last comment. This is not a general-purpose scanner, i.e. you really wouldn't want to use it as a document scanner, mainly because every time you want to use it, it needs to warm up for a minute. Fortunately I have another scanner for documents, and it works instantaneously.

It's possible that some of the items above are user error on my part, but with the meager documentation and web site, it's hard to develop a detailed understanding of the unit without a lot of experimentation, which might cause one to miss something. Your mileage might vary.

** LONG-TERM EXPERIENCE UPDATE 3/11/10:

The V700 is still working fine, after scanning at least 10,000 slides, color prints, color negatives and b&w negatives. I remain very satisfied with my purchase (I would probably upgrade my rating to 4-stars now), as it has done a lot of work for me, I've scanned a lot of stuff with good results, and it continues to work fine. In particular, I think that the V700 does a spectacular job scanning prints of any kind, and automatically recognizes where they are when you place multiple prints on the glass for a single scan - but see one of the notes below!

* None of the flimsy plastic holders has broken (yet), thank goodness. I handled them very carefully. Still worried about how I would get a replacement if needed.

* Something else I learned: The V700 recognizes each of the included film/slide holders automatically, and changes a variety of settings automatically depending upon which one it recognizes - like it or not. See next item.

* Besides my 35mm slides, I also have a large collection of "super slides" that were shot on 120 film. Even though these are mounted in standard 2x2 cardboard mounts, you cannot scan them in the slide holder, because each opening in that holder is in the shape of an "+" to allow for the possibility of a vertically- or horizontally-oriented 35mm slides. But since super slides are square and have much more film area that the rectangular 35mm slides, the holder blocks out part of each slide, making the holder unusable for such slides. Also, when you put the slide holder in, the scanner automatically assumes 35mm slides, and crops down automatically, thus throwing away part of each slide anyway.

Canon offers no additional holders as far as I can tell, so here's what I did: I used a different holder that would fit 4 2x2 objects, BUT - turned it 180 degrees on the scanner surface. This was necessary to fool the V700, which otherwise reads some coding on the bottom of the holder and then changes the settings automatically. I believe this holder is meant for raw 6x6 cm negatives, which obviously won't work for slides. Turning it 180 degrees prevented the V700 from reading the "coding" on the bottom of that holder, and allowed it to scan the whole page without changing any setting automatically. Next, I created a set of 4 identical marquees that matched the 4 slots on the holder, and saved them with a name so I could use them as a template over and over again. With this set-up, I scanned several thousand 120 super slides just fine. Again, really watch the dust.

* One more experience item: the V700 does NOT scan all the way to the left edge or the bottom edge of the glass - there seems to be a small gap near those 2 edges that is not scanned. (It does scan all the way to the top and right-hand edges.) I learned this the hard way when I was scanning prints. I started off by placing 4 - 6 prints on the glass for each scan, pushing each up to one of the edges to keep it squarely aligned. Eventually I noticed that I was missing a bit on a few of the edges, which I traced back to this problem. All works fine if you are aware of this issue.

294 of 298 people found the following review helpful.
4exceeded my expectations
By Mr E
I have a large collection of slides shot in the past 20 years. Lots of good shots on FujiChrome100 and Velvia50. In the past I've had a tough time getting good prints from them from regular photo labs, and pro printers cost too much.

I have experience with an older Nikon slide scanner, and I am getting much better results from the Epson V700 bed scanner. I see image improvements to 6400dpi, I scan to tiff at 48bit using the Epson software, then adjust color and contrast in photoshop cs2. I get very good results even from some warped slides where I always had focus problems when printed in the lab. Its very exciting to see these pictures again.

Despite good reviews of this feature, I have yet to find an acceptable result from the included automatic dust removal, both hardware and software based. The dust is gone, replaced by strange pixelation. Much better to remove the dust by hand using the CS2 repair tool, which works like magic for me. After dust removal I increase sharpness using smart sharpening, and save to jpg. Its amazing the detail that emerges with a little sharpening. Resultant jpg is 20-35megs, but is compatible with local printer's fuji frontier printer. With the control I get from manipulating and color-converting the digital image, I get prints that come out exactly as I like, better than any enlarger-based print I've ever obtained.

I won't claim the v700 will scan better than a modern slide scanner because I've never used one, but the results I get are certainly better than I expected. It is surprising to me that these slide prints are on par with what I get from my nikon d70.

Bed scanning of slides is pretty fast, about 45 minutes to scan 12 slides when scanning to my pentium m laptop. It take about a minute to put the old slides away and plop new ones into the holder.

Installation was super easy. Just install driver, plug in, start scanning. But the documentation isn't so good. There is a lot involved in getting a good scan, its sort of an art. You'll need to read a bunch on the internet. When you first get the printer, play with all the settings, scan the same slide over and over with different slide-height settings, resolutions,etc, until you find what works for you. Have an idea what you want to see, then try stuff and see if you can make it happen. Like I said above, the auto dust removal might be convenient, but the results won't withstand close scrutiny. Ditto for the scanning software based "color restoration", "sharpening", or anything else. Just post-process the 48bit tiff in photoshop.

I played around with the included silverfast SE scanning software, but found the interface clunky and there was no functional improvement over the included epson software, so I don't use it. The included detailed scan manipulation functions are all available in photoshop, so I don't bother.

When scanning photos (as opposed to film or slides), the resolution makes a huge difference. Some resultions will alias the print pattern. Getting a good scan from a print requires patience.

104 of 104 people found the following review helpful.
4Epson Perfection Scanner
By B. Vandeventer
Outstanding product quality, but it takes work to get the best out of it.

We bought this scanner to use mainly for scanning medium format film.

The scanner resolution is excellent, and the ability to scan in 16 bit mode provides extended dynamic range and ability to capture subtle tone details. However, achieveing this always requires changing the default exposure levels, particularly on the low end of the scale. A limitation of the software, however, is that the histogram tool for setting the levels always shows the scale in a linear 8 bit mode (0 to 255 levels), whereas a log scale or optical density scale would probably be more appropriate for 16 bit scans. Photshop also does not have this feature but would benefit from it.

A more troubling problem we have experienced is that all our film scans require changing the gamma of the blue channel significantly in order to achieve color balance. Once we had that figured out, the results have been excellent.

The software documentation is pretty lame, as usual.

As far as film handling goes, the slide holders seem adequate, but the film holders feel like they are going to break every time you use them. The medium format holder only holds the film by the long edges, which doesn't provide much support. One solution for this would be to improvise a filmholder which is like an enlarger holder in that it clamps the film on opposite sides of the image. The Epson filmholders have holes in them that the scanner uses to detect the holder type, and the software does a good job of detecting the borders of each image and presenting them all to you in the preview window.

Despite these nit-picks, this scanner is an excellent value. The scans we are getting off of Fuji Velvia 100 are breathtaking. I hope that the availability of these will renew interest in medium and large format film, as these offer creative options which are impossible with digital cameras.

Thursday, February 27, 2014

Where Can I Buy Nikon SA-21 35mm Strip Film Adapter for Super CoolScan Scanners

Nikon SA-21 35mm Strip Film Adapter for Super CoolScan Scanners

Nikon SA-21 35mm Strip Film Adapter for Super CoolScan Scanners Review


SA-21 35mm Strip Film Adapter for Coolscan IV/4000


Price :
* Get the best price and special discount only for limited time



Nikon SA-21 35mm Strip Film Adapter for Super CoolScan Scanners Feature


  • For Nikon Super CoolScan IV ED and V ED
  • Also works with 4000 ED and 5000 ED series
  • 35mm strip film adapter, holds 2 to 6 frames
  • 3,946 x 5,959 pixel scan range
  • Ideal for low-quantity projects; a quality Nikon accessory






Maybe you should visit the following website to get a better price and specification details

Costumer review

3 of 3 people found the following review helpful.
5Make films scanning easier !
By Hudson Camera
With SA-21 strip film adapter,
you can easily scan 6 frames a time.

You can use SA-21 on Coolscan IV ED, V ED, 4000 ED, 5000 ED scanners.

The main advantage is that:
Unlike the film holders provided by other branded Film/Flatbed Scanners
( Minolta, Epson, Microtek, etc.)
You don't need to put your film strip into a "film holder" and
worry about the dust and alignment,
The SA-21 can automatically take it,
this reduce the time and chance for your film strips getting dusts and
it always align the films correctly.

1 of 8 people found the following review helpful.
3very good item, very bad packing
By Carlos Gastelum
The product is a spare part for my slide and film scaner, the item is really good but for a small piece like this they put it in a box inside of anoter box...the big box was a 16 pounds (in volume)and I had to pay over $60.00 for the shiping from my P.O.box in Miami to Honduras where I'm living right now.

Online NeatDesk Desktop Scanner and Digital Filing System - PC refurbished

NeatDesk Desktop Scanner and Digital Filing System - PC refurbished

NeatDesk Desktop Scanner and Digital Filing System - PC refurbished Review


Refurbished in Neat box


Price :
* Get the best price and special discount only for limited time



NeatDesk Desktop Scanner and Digital Filing System - PC refurbished Feature


  • Refurbished in Neat box






Maybe you should visit the following website to get a better price and specification details

Costumer review

2 of 2 people found the following review helpful.
1DO NOT BUY. !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
By Joyce Weaver
DO NOT BUY.......I BROUGHT THIS ONE AND THE NEAT SCANNERS, BOTH BIG AND SMALL ONES. .THEY DO NOT TELL YOU THAT YOU CAN'T RE-INSTALL THIS, IF YOU LOSE YOUR MACHINE OR IF YOU HAVE TO RESTORE THE MACHINE. I WAS SO MAD, IT IS NICE, BUT IF YOU EVER HAVE TO INSTALL YOUR SOFTWARE AGAIN YOU CAN'T. I EVEN CALLED THEM ON THIS, WHEN I DISCOVERED I COULD NO LONGER INSTALL THE PROGRAM, SO BEWARE. CALL AND ASK. ITS SAD YOU BROUGHT A MACHINE OR EQUIPMENT AND ONE TIME INSTALL IS NOT ENOUGH OR EVEN TWICE. WHAT A RIP OFF, PLUS YOU CAN ONLY INSTALL THIS ON ONE MACHINE AND NOT TWO. SO THERE YOU GO. BEFORE YOU BUY ALL THESE SCANNERS, CHECK IF YOU WANT RE-INSTALL AND IF ITS UNLIMITED RE-INSTALL. THE NEAT MACHINE DOES THE SAME THING, DO NOT BUY IT NEITHER. I BROUGHT THIS FOR A TRIP AND USED IT WHILE THERE SINCE IT WAS SMALL TO SCAN PHOTOS FROM OLD FAMILY ALBUMS. MY LAPTOP CRASHED LATER AND HAD TO GET ANOTHER , WILL GUESS WHAT NOT ALLOWED TO INSTALL IT AGAIN, SO IT IS USELESS, JUST THROW IT AWAY. EVEN IF I AM THE ORIGINAL OWNER, I WAS SO MAD. AGAIN THE SCANNER BY NEAT DOES THE SAME THING, CAN'T RE-INSTALL OR USE AGAIN.

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful.
2Does not work like advertised
By Lisa
Have tried to get the Neat scanner to save my receipts and business cards but it won't work properly or sync.

0 of 0 people found the following review helpful.
4Good product
By Satish Dinakar
Does what is advertised. Have had it for a couple of months. fast and no issues so far. No complaints